THE MARINERS' CHURCH, BRITISH PUBLIC & WELLCLOSE-SQ.
Memorial to His Excellency Count Reventlow, Ambassador from Denmark to the Authorities of Great Britain and Ireland.
Honoured and Respected Sir,—Last Friday, February 13th, 1846, was the
painful anniversary of the day, February 13th, 1845, when a reckless
English attorney, (in the name of a deceased Dane), and with a gang of
desperate sheriffs' officers, suddenly burst into my room, and arrested
me for their own law costs,
about the church in Wellclose-square; and, then, they went over, and
violently broke open that Church, leaving me in custody, (without any
offence on my part); and most unjustly and cruelly they forced me away
from divine worship with poor destitute sailors and soldiers' orphan
children, and hurried me through the streets, as a prisoner, to a most
expensive spunging house; from whence I was, in a few days, after
paying £4, cast into the Queen's Prison for nearly five months, at the
suit of the deceased Dane, Jens Wolff, and a young Dane, Ernst Wolff,
of Hull, with whom I never had any transactions whatever. The church in
Wellclose-square, formerly occupied as a Danish church, was then
violently forced from our British and Foreign Seamen and Soldiers' Friend Society,
by two English lawyers, Messrs. Sheffields; and it was taken from our
Orphan Society, and our Temperance Society, and transferred to a rival institution of decided adversaries, who have revelled in the fruits of our twenty years' labors, after the British public had expended, through our society, upwards of five thousand pounds
in repairs, improvements, and various expenditures upon this church and
the ground. Excellent Sir, writhing, as I was, in prison with
affliction and agonizing persecutions, I took the liberty of addressing
a memorial to your Excellency, and a humble petition to the Danish
Government at Copenhagen, and a most respectful petition, as a
Christian minister of the church for twenty years, to his Majesty the
King of Denmark,—and forwarded the whole to your Excellency, hoping to
be honoured with some reply from the city and throne of Copenhagen. The
year of our bitter sufferings has, however, been exhausted and we have
not been favoured with any reply from your august Sovereign, or his Majesty's government. I am, therefore, constrained, as a steward of the British public, and the founder of Religious and Temperance Instruction Societies, for British and Foreign sailors,
to appeal finally to your Excellency, in the fervent hope that you will
not fail to communicate and recommend this memorial to the
constituted authorities of Denmark. I pleaded in my appeal last year,
the extraordinary condescention and kindness of the then Crown Prince
of Denmark, who, by promptly granting
a truce of twelve hours on April 2nd, 1801, to Admiral Lord Nelson,
mercifully saved the lives of those of us who were forced into the
horrors of war, in the ships that were near the three crown batteries,
and the batteries on shore, that might have sunk and destroyed our
ships and lives, after the DONNE BRIG blew up, at four p.m., had the
firing continued all night, and three of our largest ships aground. I
pleaded, also, the prompt and noble humanity and generosity of Denmark,
when our repaired fleet were on the point of entering Carlscrona,
in Sweden, and engaging the Swedish fleet and batteries, where many of
us must have perished, and our decks have been covered with blood and
slaughter, had it not been for the zeal of your noble father, who was
then prime minister at Copenhagen, who dispatched a fast sailing vessel
to our fleet, with the account of the death of Paul, the Emperor of
Russia, and the head of the Northern Coalition; and as that vessel and
those dispatches reached our fleets just in time, our live were saved,
and we sailed from Carlscrona, and anchored, by the mercy and goodness of God, safe in Kioge Bay, where we enjoyed tbe blessings of peace with Denmark once more, after all the dreadful and sanguinary conflicts at Copenhagen. I had hoped, after upwards of forty years peace with Denmark, that our society and the British public might have enjoyed a renewal of Christian kindness and charity, in our deliverance from those unchristian lawyers, and their employer at Hull,
and the restoration of the church to the accustomed worship of Almighty
God for sailors' orphans, and the temperance rescue of the degraded
inebriates, of every country, in our fatal drinking port of London. In this hope, however, we are now sadly disappointed.
BRIEF HISTORY OF THE DANISH CHURCH & ITS OCCUPTATION
I may now plead with your Excellency and your Government, that you most
naturally and keenly felt the bold measure of the British Government,
in the early part of this century, when a fleet was sent over to
Copenhagen, and the Danish fleet was forced from your harbour, and
taken away, to prevent the enemies of England pre-occupying that fleet,
to assist their combined force against this country. Your Government
then, Sir, and your nation at large, loudly exclaimed against England;
and your remonstrances and appeals were responded to by thousands of
Englishmen in this country, who pleaded hard for redress and kindness
to the Danes, whose ancestors once occupied and ruled in this nation of
Britain. I might, also, plead that the Danish claims of merchants for
detained Danish ships, and wasted or captured property, were long
pleaded in our British House of Commons; and, at length, met with that
justice and equity that was due to the honoured brothers of Englishmen
in Denmark, with whom we never ought to war, but to cultivate mutual
peace and prosperity. With such sentiments, I must now, Sir, appeal to
you and, through you, to the authorities of Copenhagen, and to the British nation
at large, and present the following details of our particular case, as
it stands connected with the church in Wellclose-square. I must
apologize, therefore, for being so prolix and methodical; but the case
at present, and the interest of poor Danish families, and the good of
posterity in future generations, leave me no alternative but to do my
duty faithfully and fearlessly, at a minister of that church, and as
the superintendent of our society. Allow me, then, to call the
attention of your Excellency to the following particulars.
First. The peace of
1814, and falling off of the congregation, who consisted originally of
Danes and Norwegians; but Norway, at that peace, having been ceded to
Sweden, the Norwegians, as a matter of course, were transferred to the
Swedish Church in Prince's-square, Ratcliffe-highway. The death of some
Danes, and removal of others, and intermarriages with English families,
drew off the congregation, so that the Danish minister left England,
and the church was shut up, and for nearly ten years was wholly
deserted.
Second. The forlorn and
neglected state of the church during all the years of its desertion.
This was most remarkable, as it does not appear by information that I
have been able to gain, that any of tbe elders paid the least attention to it,
excepting (and that very seldom) when some respectable Dane was to be
interred in the vaults. Then the church was for an hour, but
immediately afterwards closed for months, until an event occurred.
Applications had been made, I understand, by the Church of England, and
other to rent the church; but tbe Danes being Lutherans, it was
objected that it could not be let to any sect; and those who applied
relinquished, from a conviction that the title to it was not
sufficently safe. A poor old Dane occasionally entered the vestry, (but
I fear for no very good purpose), on dark nights, when sailors and
their guilty companions prowled about the outer ground, amidst this
gloomy central part of the square, to which the old oil lamps of London
afforded so little light, and when the old watchmen of London paid so
little attention to dark avenues, before the metropolitan police were
established. I examined the state of the square in 1824, a year before
we took the church, and I found it most gloomy and forbidding indeed by
night. I then applied to the elders about the church, and they said
they could not let it to any sect. I assured them that our society were completely unsectarian; for that while it was an union of all orthodox protestant Christians, its grand object was general religious instruction,
without reference or prominence to any sect or party whatever. On these
grounds the church was originally taken by us in 1825, but it is not so
now, as a peculiar sect of dissenters occupy the church.
CHURCH SURRENDER AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS Third. The entire surrender of all control or right to the church as
we understand, about the year 1817, by the King of Denmark, that there
might be no claim made hereafter to the Court of Denmark about the
church. This was done, as we are told, by a formal surrender of the
church to the congregation; but as there was no congregation left, the few surviving elders received the surrender, and let everything
remain, considering that all power or right over the church rested
alone with them, as I understood from them, and with no one else, at
home or abroad. Mr. Alsing, son of one of the elders, informs us that
the Danish Government at Copenhagen had a fund belonging to the church
in the square, and that this fund they appropriated to government
uses; but no doubt they considered they had a right to do this, and it
was no business of ours, although he said he had been over to
Copenhagen about it, and applied in vain respecting it.
Fourth. The
forfeiture of all right of control over the church, honestly by the
elders, in consequence of a misappropriation of church funds to a large
amount. We have understood, and published it last year, as your
Excellency must remember, and it has never been contradicted to us,
that there were about £1300 of church funds in some deposit, and that
the firm of Messrs.George and Jens Wolff borrowed this money, as
elders, by consent of the only other elder, Mr. Alsing, senior; but in
consequence of a failure of that house, not above £300 of this money
was returned: so that the church having suffered a loss of One
Thousand Pounds by the elders, it is natural to conclude their right
and control over the church did cease, and ought in common justice to
have ceased. WE DEMAND, THEN, WHAT RIGHT had the lawyers to bring an
action of ejectment against me, about the church in the name of Jens
Wolff, who was then the surviving partner in this firm; and in in the
name of Ernst Wolff, who, we understand, never was chosen an elder by
the congregation, according to the Danish law, and with whom, as an
elder, we never had, to my recollection, any transaction whatever. This
action was basely continued in its consequences, by keeping me in
prison for their law costs, even after Jens Wolff, the only real
surviving elder, was dead; and although an offer was made of compromise
to those lawyers, and a medical certificate obtained of my afflicted
state in the prison, they actually refused this compromise, in the
name of this young man at HULL, Ernst Wolff, as their employer, but
with whom never before had any concern about the church.
SURPLUS RENT, DANISH FAILURE AND JEFFERY SQUARE
Fifth. Our annual payment of surplus rent to Jens Wolff, or of late
years to those attornies. Soon after we had taken the church, at a rent
of £50 per annum, we were requested to relieve the office of Messrs. G.
and I. Wolff, John-street, America-square, of all future applications
of poor Danes and their families, for monthly payments. This being an
act of Christian charity, we immediately complied with this request;
and every month all shipwrecked and distressed Danes, and poor Danish
families, residing in London, applied to our office, and were regularly
paid a month's pension; and as fresh applications were made to us, we
made the fullest enquiry that they were real cases of distress, and
then entered them as such in our office books;and every half-year we
presented an account of monies paid to pensioners: and all this
without charging one penny for our labour; although, in many instances,
it was attended with much trouble and inconvenience, to find out the
real truth of every case that came to our office. And as Danes,
in general, were sent to me as the minister, from all parts of the
kingdom, I had, of course, additional duties to perform, in
connection with the Church, and all without the slightest remuneration.
I had also to visit some poor Danes, and even to clothe some poor
orphans of Danes; and I have collected many Danes in the Church, at
times, and given them Danish books of religion, and requested them to
read aloud from them, and have then commended them and their country to
God, in solemn prayer. The surplus rent we always paid over to Mr. Jens
Wolff, or, of late years, since he has lived in Brussels, to Messrs.
Sheffields, his attornies.
Sixth. The appropriation of this
surplus rent for 20 years; and the reasons why the lawyers refused, for
three months, all the applications of distressed Danish pensioners for
relief, when the lawyers had cast me into prison, and forced the church
away from our society. The British Public cannot imagine, in common
honesty, now, what right Jens Wolff, or his attornies, had to this surplus rent, especially after tbe failure of his firm had swallowed
up so much of the church funds. We do certainly consider that no person
on earth had any right to this surplus rent, (least of all Jens Wolff
or his attornies), but the poor Danes; and as this rent has been paid
by the British public we cannot, and we dare not, suffer this to
rest quiet, until we have a plain, honest, answer to our demand, what
right had Jens Wolff to any part of this surplus rent? and to whom did
Messrs. Sheffields pay the surplus rent they have received of late from
us; and by what right of justice or equity, or common honesty, take
this rent, and refuse for months to render any assistance to the poor
distressed Danish families whom we sent to them,—after they had taken
the church from us? Many of those poor Danes I relieved, from real
compassion, who came to me while I was in prison. Our usual surplus
rent was offered to the Sheffields when they proceeded with their
desperate action of ejectment, but refused, when they declared that
they determined to have the church from us.
Seventh. In
addition to all those grievances, we consider the present arrangements
of those lawyers, in the name of the only surviving nominal Elder, in
Hull, is most insecure and unsafe for the property of the church, and
the succeeding generation of poor Danes. The society that has now taken
the church, had its origin thus. 1 was directed, in providence, to
commence the first Thames Mission, in 1817; from whence arose, the
next year, the Port of London Society, and a Floating Chapel. I was
compelled to form our present society in 1819, from the opposition of
the Port Society to our Bethel meetings afloat. This opposition
continued, with dreadful persecutions, until 1832, when the Port
Society failed altogether; and the Floating Chapel, after some
thousands of pounds had been sunk in her, was broken up and sold. The
present society of Jeffery Square, that now holds the church, was
formed after Alderman Sir John Key, and other gentlemen and
tradesmen, had been defrauded, and its leading men consist of one
peculiar sect of dissenters from the Church of England.
INSECURITY, PRIVATE GAIN AND BRITISH PUBLIC DEMANDS
Now it is most notorious, that nothing has proved more uncertain than
the property of dissenting chapels. Many have changed their sentiments,
and converted them to other doctrines. Trustees have died off, and
others not being chosen, the chapels have been sold for houses, or
shops, or ware-houses, or even play-houses. The Jeffery Square Society
is only held together by voluntary subscriptions, and many such
societies have failed. The Children's Friend Society, for instance,
with great patronage, and nearly two hundred poor children supported,
has sunk entirely; and the Jeffery Square Society, that has the
church, has already failed, in a chapel at Bell Wharf, Shadwell,
and is chiefly now kept up by one minister who has a chapel in
Ratcliffe-highway. This minister has a salary from the Society, as he
has succeeded Mr. Ferguson, who left the society as Secretary. G.F.
Angus, Esq., also a respectable merchant, retired from it; and should
the funds fall off, this society must give up the church, and cease to
pay the poor Danish pensioners. Who then is to look after the church
and the Danes? Can your Excellency suppose for a moment that a British
public would be satisfied to have the church, which has cost them so
much money, left in the hands, and at the disposal of those lawyers
who have nearly sacrificed my life, about the church, for some view
of worldly gain; and left the poor Danes for months, to perish. Who
else is there in England to look alter the church? but those two
lawyers, and their employer, in Hull, who has no color of right to it!
We have applied to your Excellency; and you have told us you cannot
move, about the church, without orders from your Government. We have,
then, respectfully applied to that Government, but have not been
favored with any decision; so that it has long since appeared, to many,
that there is no one in this kingdom to look after this property, the
church in Welclose [sic]-square, but those two attornies, Messrs.
Sheffields, and they only by sufferance, in the name of a person at
Hull; who never having done anything for the church, for twenty years,
has no just right, whatever, to authorise those Lawyers to proceed
about the church, and divide some rent among themselves, to which they
have not the least shadow of claim. Should this young man of Hull, die,
what use may the two lawyers, in London, make of the church? Why,
according to all appearances, just what use they please, so as money
can he made of it, and no one to control them.
Eighth. Under all
these circumstances, we deem it to be our duty, your Excellency, most
respectfully but firmly to demand of your Excellency, and of your
distinguished Government, that the Church be given up to the British
public, through our society, and by my superintendance.
1st. Because
the public have expended upwards of £5,000 during the last twenty
years, through our society.
2nd. Because there has been no one to
look after the church but our society, with my superintendance, and we
can conscientiously declare we have done our duty to the church, and to
the poor Danes, who have been dependent on its bounty.
3rd. Because of
my cruel sufferings as the victim of the lawyers, who profess to have
acted under the deceased elder and survivor, in Hull.
And 4th., Because
we are bound, before God, and the public, to take charge of this
property solemnly and sacredly, upon the following terms.
First. I should consider it my bounded duty to have the church placed
in safe and secure hands, as trustees, who should faithfully convey
their trust to those who might survive them; and the church be thus
preserved under proper management for posterity.
Second. As the
only person in this country who has had charge of the poor Danish
pensioners for twenty years, I consider it my right and my duty to
stipulate that they should continue to receive the usual pensions from
the proceeds of the church; and such religious attentions as were
necessary.
Third. That this church should be kept in due repair for
divine worship, without any rent to be demanded from any quarter, but
that funds be provided in the church, for the poor pensioners, and the
annual repairs and expenditure.
Fourth. That with those views,
every attention should be paid to the church, as our property, to be
maintained for divine worship, and as a sacred mausoleum of the Danish
dead; and that some few of the more respectable Danes, whose families
desired it, might be carefully and solemnly interred in tbe vaults
beneath the church; where I had stipulated with the deceased elders
that my dust shoudl be finally consigned, and to which they had given
me their solemn and unanimous consent. These terms being agreed to, I
should be willing to enter into any legal security that they should
carried into effect, on the church being duly transferred to us; and
should thus cease all further agitation on the subject, and rejoice and
praise God, to think that for the good of posterity, and the security
and comfort of poor Danes, we had thus succeeded, after all the immense
expences [sic] we have incurred about the business, and all the
dreadful suffering we had endured, to ensure the just right of this
church; and the due and constant worship of Almighty God in it, when
our Excellency and your humble memorialist are removed by death to the
silent tomb. I must now leave those appeals with your Excellency, and
all persons you may deem it right to consult about them, hoping and
expecting to receive the favorable decision of your Excellency, (as I
am bound to agitate until this is settled.) I remain your
Excellency's most humble and obedient servant, George Charles
Smith, Superintendent Manager of the British and Foreign Seamen
and Soldiers' Friendly Society, Commercial Road, Stepney, Feb. 1846.
P.S. The British public will now wait and see if Count Reventlow and
the Danish Authorities will peaceably yield to the rights and claim now
advanced for it. Five thousand pounds have been paid by the British
public for the church, through our society, our claim is established,
and if the funds of he church were swallowed up by the Danish
Government, at Copenhagen, their claims must cease. And if the house of
Wolff's sunk one thousand pounds of the Danish church funds; and the
surplus rents are of no avail to pensioners, all claim of the only
surviving Wolff, at Hull, is gone; and with him ceases all right of Sheffields to let the church to Hyatt and his colleagues; and
all right from Jeffery Square to hold the church from us a day
longer. Hear this all people and nations!
|